I specifically did. Go back and read my post.
You asked a series insinuating questions that followed from nothing that I said. Then you made an incorrect accusation.
If you don't want to be accused of being paranoid, then don't act paranoid.
Q for you: Do you beat your wife?
What? Nothing that you've said deserves that question to be asked of you?
No, you didn't.
Go back and read my post.
What, again? Did you edit it? Did something change from the first three times I read it?
You asked a series insinuating questions that followed from nothing that I said.
No, I asked you a series of direct questions that directly addressed what you wrote and led to a logical conclusion.
Then you made an incorrect accusation.
You were homering for, defending, George H.W. Bush and trying to deflect things that attached to his responsibility onto other people.
If you don't want to be accused of being paranoid, then don't act paranoid.
There, you did it again. Ad hominem, a typical 'Rat stunt. Do I conclude from that that you're a 'Rat troll come a-calling? No, but you're engaging in polemic against honest FReepers -- more honest than you, by the way -- in order to defend mindlessly a Bush family member just because he's a Bush and a Republican.
That is an abdication of fundamental honesty.
Q for you: Do you beat your wife?
I'm unmarried.
What? Nothing that you've said deserves that question to be asked of you?
You bozo. I'll just let that one twist in the wind.