Posted on 01/07/2006 8:30:28 PM PST by quidnunc
Danville, Va. Everyone who worships at the Tabernacle quickly learns three facts about its deeply conservative pastor. He comes from a broken home. He rides a canary-yellow Harley. And he loves the Jews.
There is some murmuring about the motorcycle. But the 2,500 members of this Bible-believing, tradition-respecting Southern Baptist church in southern Virginia have embraced everything else about the Rev. Lamarr Mooneyham.
Out of his painful childhood experiences, Mooneyham, 57, preaches passionately about the importance of home. Out of his reading of the Bible, he preaches with equal passion about God's continuing devotion to the Jewish people.
"I feel jealous sometimes. This term that keeps coming up in the Old Book the Chosen, the Chosen," says the minister, who has made three trips to Israel and named his sons Isaac, Jacob and Joseph. "I'm a pardoned gentile, but I'm not one of the Chosen People. They're the apple of his eye."
Scholars of religion call this worldview "philo-Semitism," the opposite of anti-Semitism. It is a burgeoning phenomenon in evangelical Christian churches across the country, a hot topic in Jewish historical studies and a wellspring of support for Israel.
Yet many Jews are nervous about evangelicals' intentions. In recent weeks, leaders of three of the nation's largest Jewish groups the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the Union for Reform Judaism have decried what they see as a mounting threat to the separation of church and state from evangelicals emboldened by the belief that they have an ally in the White House and an opportunity to shift the Supreme Court.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
"Why not Semitophile?"
I don't know. Maybe it just sounded funny, or they wanted a more symmetrical counterweight to "anti-Semite?"
"What are the commandments that we are asked by Y'shua to keep?"
Just got back from Tennis.
Christ declared that He was not sent but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, though he did defer to Gentiles on occasion. He operated under the Mosaic Dispensation in keeping the old law and also expecting others to do the same. He also expected the Jews to accept the dispensation of John the Baptizer, submitting to this baptism Himself and His disciples baptizing more than John. Once He took the old law out of the way, nailing it to His cross, the world was in transistion from the old covenant to the new covenant, with the new covenant beginning to be disclosed with the first Pentecost following His resurection and both covenants continuing until the gospel had been fully preached. (Col 1:23) Christ gave authority to His disciples to bind the new covenant to us. "But whoso keepeth his word in him verily is the love God perfected...." (1st Jno 2:5) ("eth" implies continuing action. One of the benefits of old English.) The commandments of the new covenant are contained in the New Testament. Hope I have answered your question. Regards.
He may very well be correct, even if he doesn't know what he is saying (or because he doesn't know what he is saying)
Matthew 24:31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect* from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
1588 eklektos {ek-lek-tos'}
from 1586; TDNT - 4:181,505; adj
AV - elect 16, chosen 7; 23
1) picked out, chosen
1a) chosen by God,
1a1) to obtain salvation through Christ
1a1a) Christians are called "chosen or elect" of God
1a2) the Messiah in called "elect", as appointed by God to the
most exalted office conceivable
1a3) choice, select, i.e. the best of its kind or class,
excellence preeminent: applied to certain individual
Christians
Oops.
You're not saying that the left-behind people may be themselves left behind are you? ;-)
"'"Christian support for Israel is hardly a new "phenonemon".'"
(FB) "This is correct. I too was wondering where the author of the article had been. I've been listening to pro-Israel Christian preachers since early childhood. President Reagan was very much in tune with Christian preachers who were pr-Israel."
Zionist Conspirator: "It goes back a lot further than Ronald Reagan."
ZC, my "early childhood" goes back a lot further than Ronald Reagan's political days. I was stating that it was a characteristic of his thinking.
I have articles in my possession written by Jews in England long before 1884, speaking of establishing their homeland in the Abrahamic/Davidic land. They were compiled among writings of Premillennial Christian prophetic writers who were publiching journals of their conferences from 1884 to 1915. They speak of Jewish settlements as far east as Shanghai, China being in existance in that day. MOST interesting.
Ping!
For Catholic FRiends, please see Zetman's comments at #97, which contains some good, honest questions you all might be able to answer better than I, having been Catholic longer than me. Thanks!
The Niagara Prophecy Conferences held in Niagara, NY in the 1870's had a similar theme. And of course anti-Zionists love to cite John Nelson Darby and the Plymouth Brethren as the "inventors" of chr*stian Zionism, but as I said, even Increase Mather back in the seventeenth century had written a book entitled The Mystery of Israel's Salvation that insisted that Israel's rejection of J*sus did not end G-d's covenent with them. Unfortunately his son Cotton, who was raised with this belief, later rejected it.
The Jewish blessing goes far beyond a tribal blessing of those that support her.
In fact, it says that ALL the nations of the world will be blessed through her. (I paraphrase, but its accurate)
The messiah came to the jews and was later made available to the gentile world. All the people of the world are made blessed in their reception and faith in the messiah of the jews. Many christians are not supporters of the jews. They have an indifference usually based on ignorance, sometimes on learned animosity, but they are still blessed in Christ through the jewish religion.
No other tribal deity can make so grand a claim. At the least, they can not support such a grand claim.
Shouldn't the terms be "Semitiphilic" and "Semitiphobic"? Those sound better to me than the "anti-" and "phili-" variants.
Correction: Those sound better to me than the "anti-" and "philo-" variants.
I love these posts, you can watch the tares being bundled before your eyes.
:-)
A is representative of the tribal deity known as the god of Abraham.
Group X is en toto all those who followed that tribal deity prior to the time of Christ's corporeal ministry, and also those who follow the same tribal deity now and don't believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Group Y then, previously unmentioned if explicitly implied, is en toto everyone who believes in the divinity of Jesus Christ and don't believe in the tribal deity known as the god of Abraham.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.