Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phocion
The bold sentence is exactly 100% of the reason intelligent design does not belong in a science course. There is no problem teaching it in theology or philosophy classes.

You statement is the statement of someone who has not looked at ID carefully and thoroughly, but is content to regurgitate the half-baked contentions that other shallow thinkers have made based on their own limited study or hearsay evidence.

75 posted on 01/08/2006 10:43:41 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

So you disagree with the article's statement that ID is not science?


85 posted on 01/08/2006 11:00:44 AM PST by Phocion ("Protection" really means exploiting the consumer. - Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson