Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226
It is far from being a semantic question. Life is almost impossible to define

I beg your pardon! If it's almost impossible to define "life," then you can't get hung up on how "life" began, because you have already admitted you don't know what "life" means.

Incidentally, I think I could do a pretty good job articulating why your examples aren't "alive," but I also think that, given the present state of technology, you could make a virus particle from scratch and it would work, and there are some things even more complex than viruses (that is, even deeper into the gray area of life) that could also be made from scratch. A person today, no, but things that some people consider are "alive," today, yes.

31 posted on 01/07/2006 8:58:33 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan

Make a single celled organism that is alive, and since you can articulate why my examples aren't alive, articulate why yours is.

And there is still a huge debate over whether virusews are alive.


40 posted on 01/07/2006 9:11:10 PM PST by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson