To: neverdem
If economically viable, I have no problem using either. Also, ethanol should be cost-adjusted for the lower BTu value.
7 posted on
01/07/2006 7:46:01 PM PST by
Fierce Allegiance
(Smoked a big cigar, drove a Cadillac car, said "Boss, I think this band's outta sight!")
To: Fierce Allegiance
If economically viable, I have no problem using either. Also, ethanol should be cost-adjusted for the lower BTu value. "The National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) is disputing a study conducted by Cornell University's David Pimentel and University of California, Berkeley, professor Tad Patzek that states ethanol has a net energy balance loss of 29%." from Ethanol's energy balance sparks debate
15 posted on
01/07/2006 7:56:16 PM PST by
p23185
(Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson