Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csmusaret
Nope. They don't say hang up and get a warrant. They say comply with FISA, and go get a warrant within 72 hours, but you can keep listening while you do so.

If you place the decision on who is deserving of being eavesdropped solely in the hands of the eavesdropper, you no longer have any protection against eavesdropping by your government.

16 posted on 01/07/2006 10:07:36 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul

"Nope. They don't say hang up and get a warrant. They say comply with FISA, and go get a warrant within 72 hours, but you can keep listening while you do so.
If you place the decision on who is deserving of being eavesdropped solely in the hands of the eavesdropper, you no longer have any protection against eavesdropping by your government."




You are correct. However, the thrust of opinion here on FR is to let the government do as it wishes with regard to this eavesdropping.

That's fine, as long as an administration on the right side is doing it. The question everyone needs to ask is: What about a liberal Dem administration?

Yes, we need this information about calls between US Citizens and potential foreign terrorists. There is a process in place to do this, with retroactive warrants, if necessary. I'm still not sure we need to change that, since it seems perfectly workable to me.


23 posted on 01/07/2006 10:11:53 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson