Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cahome

"So you think DeLay should leave in disgrace and he's a shyster."

Here's my position, loud and clear, so to speak: I think they ALL are disgraceful shysters. Period.

You, on the other hand, have the option of staying stuck on stupid, and convincing yourself there is a dime's worth of difference between any of the lot. You are just what the bastards are looking for and counting on to keep them ensconced in office forever.


488 posted on 01/07/2006 5:01:06 PM PST by thelastvirgil ("When the roll is called in congress, they don't know whether to answer 'present' or 'not guilty'.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]


To: thelastvirgil

Yep. Not a dime's worth of difference between the President and John Kerry, or Dennis Hastert and Nancy Pelosi, or Bill Frist and Harry Reid.............not a dime's worth.....


490 posted on 01/07/2006 5:13:38 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]

To: thelastvirgil
You are just what the bastards are looking for and counting on to keep them ensconced in office forever.

IIRC, "the bastards" is a term of endearment reserved for voters.
As in, "The people have spoken, the bastards."

Case in point: a recent stunt by BBC Radio 4's Today program. As an exercise in grass-roots lobbying, Today asked its 6 million weekly listeners to propose a new law for the new year. A labour MP, Stephen Pound, was drafted to front the bill when it was all over.

More than 10,000 new laws were suggested over the course of a couple weeks. Of those, five were short-listed and voted on via email and telephone by some 26,007 respondents. The results, as one wag put it, "blew up" in the face of Today's producers and presenters.

Clearly expecting some sensible law mandating fat-free potato chips or renewed efforts to save the ruby-throated thrush of Upper Equatorial Guinea, the organizers were obviously aghast when the winner, with 37 percent of the vote, was a law allowing homeowners to use "any means" to defend their property from intruders.

Runners-up included measures forcing people to opt-out if they didn't want their organs donated for transplant after death, a bill to ban smoking in all workplaces including bars and restaurants, a double-headed one on term limits for prime ministers and compulsory voting, and, finally, a ban on Christmas advertising before December 1.

The winning law quickly became known as "Tony Martin's Law" after the Norfolk farmer who spent nearly four years in jail for killing a 16-year-old burglar who had broken into his home.

Currently, the law allows the use of "reasonable force," but in practical terms it tends to weigh heavily in favor of the wrongdoer instead of the wronged, and draconian weapons laws mean homeowners are unlikely to have more than a cricket bat or soup ladle to defend themselves. Tony Martin, in a far-from-unusual act of gall, was sued for lost wages by a second burglar he merely winged.

But after he heard the result, the Labour politician appeared to withdraw his support, arguing: "This bill is unworkable," as it "endorses the slaughter of 16-year-old kids."

Mr. Pound was apoplectic. The bill was "unworkable," he said. "I can't remember who it was who said 'The people have spoken - the bastards,'" he quipped.

http://www.techcentralstation.com/012304A.html


500 posted on 01/07/2006 6:33:18 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson