Skip to comments.
Nuclear 9/11:
The New Media Journal ^
| Ja. 5, 2006
| Ryan Mauro
Posted on 01/07/2006 6:25:08 AM PST by radar101
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
01/07/2006 6:25:09 AM PST
by
radar101
To: radar101
2
posted on
01/07/2006 6:32:53 AM PST
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: radar101
Looks like RATs are on the AQ payroll, judging by their efforts to undermine US President, security, with all the vicious attacks and MSM support.
God save us from another successful AQ "adventure".
Vote the bastRATs out into oblivion!!!
To: radar101
Thanks for the post. Doug Hagmann (Northeast Intelligence Network)had a heart attack recently. http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/
The author, Ryan Mauro, does work for them.
4
posted on
01/07/2006 6:48:02 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: radar101
I don't get it. If this were all true, President Bush would simply have gone in front of the American people and cited the same evidence. Case closed.
5
posted on
01/07/2006 6:51:39 AM PST
by
gotribe
(Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
To: WestCoastGal; MamaDearest; nw_arizona_granny; DAVEY CROCKETT; Cindy
"American Hiroshima" bump.
To: sure_fine
This or similar articles have been posted a billion times, discussed ad nauseam, and debunked as ridiculous nonsense.
Boy a lot of people hope it's true though.
To: PGalt
Ryan Mauro, does work for them.R.M. is quite young and surprisingly brilliant.
8
posted on
01/07/2006 7:09:21 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
("If someone is callin' you from Al Queda, we want to know why.")
To: radar101
I have a unique background. I hold a Ph.D. in philosophy from Drew University and I am a seasoned and award-winning journalist When this man's first words are an "appeal to authority," I grew suspicious. Why not just let the "facts" speak for themselves, rather than requiring me to "just believe" him because of his being smarter than me?
9
posted on
01/07/2006 7:10:29 AM PST
by
Theo
To: gotribe
This article is not compelling in proving that terrorists possess nukes. However, if they do and they set one off in the USA, I hope we have a President that will have the backbone to do what has to be done to defeat the enemy.
To: radar101
Bookmark for later reading. Looks interestiing.
To: radar101
PW is a tool of the fearmongers.
12
posted on
01/07/2006 7:15:45 AM PST
by
lugsoul
("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
To: GeorgefromGeorgia
13
posted on
01/07/2006 7:16:12 AM PST
by
null and void
(The lesson of the holocaust: if someone says they are going to kill you, pay attention.)
To: radar101
Award winning journalist was as far as I needed to read. I knew the rest would be undocumented and completely fabricated. It is so easy to take well known facts and then spin a fabulous story that connects them all together. That's why journalists receive awards.
14
posted on
01/07/2006 7:18:06 AM PST
by
UseYourHead
(Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talking.)
To: radar101
This could never happen. Everybody knows Bush sealed the border after 9-11 to prevent anything like this from happening.
15
posted on
01/07/2006 7:39:08 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: null and void
To: Leo Carpathian
"More importantly, there is empirical proof that al Qaeda possesses nukes. In 2000, British agents posed as recruits from a London mosque to infiltrate al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan . In Herat , they saw nuclear weapons being manufactured."
My own sense is that the article is filled with alot of speculation and unsubstantiated, undocumented and unverifiable "facts" that need to be questioned.
The quote above is just one example. Knowing what we know about the requirements for manufacturing nukes, there is no way such a high-tech and dominant facility was established in an "Al Queda training camp", in Herat or anywhere else.
17
posted on
01/07/2006 8:48:58 AM PST
by
Wuli
To: Leo Carpathian
"More importantly, there is empirical proof that al Qaeda possesses nukes. In 2000, British agents posed as recruits from a London mosque to infiltrate al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan . In Herat , they saw nuclear weapons being manufactured."
My own sense is that the article is filled with alot of speculation and unsubstantiated, undocumented and unverifiable "facts" that need to be questioned.
The quote above is just one example. Knowing what we know about the requirements for manufacturing nukes, there is no way such a high-tech and dominant facility was established in an "Al Queda training camp", in Herat or anywhere else.
18
posted on
01/07/2006 8:49:51 AM PST
by
Wuli
To: gotribe
"President Bush"
There are different levels of proof. There is proof enough to make a case, their is proof enough to convince a jury. This author is making a case. President Bush needs enough evidence to convince the jury.
19
posted on
01/07/2006 8:52:51 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Marine Corp T-Shirt "Guns don't kill people. I kill people." {Both Arabic and English})
To: radar101
PW: I have a unique background. I hold a Ph.D. in philosophy from Drew University and I am a seasoned and award-winning journalist.Wow! This guy is really, really special.
20
posted on
01/07/2006 9:17:30 AM PST
by
Rudder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson