Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
Basically it's a cost-saving measure that will eventually be completely fixed across the entire Army.

It's sad to think that something as important as a soldier's body armor has to wait as a 'cost-savings measure'. Obviously the coverage.

18 posted on 01/07/2006 7:07:15 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

At least we have body armor. I read about some of the fatal wounds from WWII and Vietnam, and it's just pathetic. One that stood out in my mind was the SOG in Vietnam--this one SOG team was being chased by an NVA patrol. A mortar round blew up a tree near one of the operators and a splinter from the tree pierced his heart, killing him instantly. A complete waste of a well-trained warrior. Nowadays, such losses are minimized.


19 posted on 01/07/2006 7:44:17 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson