If a psychological abnormality (what used to be called a "mental illness") is defined as a deviation from the norm, then it is statistically more valid to call homosexuality a psychopathology than the hatred of homosexuality. In other words, it is far more statistically likely that people HATE homosexuals than that they ARE homosexuals.
Their new power grab is to promote the idea that those who criticize or characterize them as mentally ill or immoral are the ones in need of 'mental health' services...
America is in the fight of it's life with enemies foreign and domestic..from without and within-as well as political, economic, cultural, and spiritual.
The sodomite agenda is to shut down God's word on the subject...and make the bible 'hate speech' at least on the lesbian and sodomite issues.
How well they mesh with the Islamo-fascists,Marxists,Narco Terrorists,Pedophiles,Pornographers,and Third Way-Fourth Reich enemies of the Republic of our Founding Fathers.
imo
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Do you see it coming? I saw it coming in the late 80s. CPS knocks at your door - grabs your kids - you aren't fit to have custody. Why? You told them that homosexuality was abnormal, unnatural and immoral. You're guilty of homophobia or sick with homophoba. Mandatory medical treatment. Gotta take your meds or back to the hospital. They'll allow supervised visits with your children as long as you get treatment.
Meanwhile, homosexuals are foster and adoptive parents.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
Ah yes....and in the end, evil will be called good...and good will be called evil.
Lover your laughing little guy!!!!!!!!
Dunbar is probably also a certifed and mentally unstable pervert.
Underneath it all, Sheldon may be as 'queer as a three dollar bill'.
Sheldon also has some peculiarities of his behavior. Like his campaigning against allowing the reimportation of prescription medicines from Canada. It turns out Sheldon had sold out to the drug manufacturers and duped his followers into acting as unwitting lobbyists for the drug companies. The House Conservative Caucus barred Sheldon from their meetings, because of that little escapade. Sheldon is nothing better than a con man, a common grifter.
How about we just classify everyone as having a delusional disorder (do I really need the /sarc here, folks?)
In all seriousness, it seems this guy sounds like a real Nutt-Case himself. After all, what is it they say about people and glass houses?
Besides Cameron's reputation as a notorious fraud, there is this interview (March 18, 1999( of Cameron by Rolling Stone Magazine, where Cameron says:
"If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own personal amusement, and all you want is the most satisfying orgasm you can get - and that is what hosexuality seems to be - then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The evidence is that men do a better job on men, and women on women, if all you are looking for is orgasm....It's almost like pure heroin. It's such a rush...."
It does appear that Cameron is totally obsessed with having sex with another man. Does this mean that Cameron is also as 'queer as a three dollar bill'? If so, it means that Cameron is in a deep state of denial about his own sexuality, attacking gays as a means of convincing himself he is not gay.
That sounds like pathological behavior.
These are the same people who were sure that people had repressed memories that they didn't, in fact, have.
Me thinks that the delusional problem, it is that people with disturbance have convinced some in society that the disturbance is elsewhere. From this article, they're still working on that.
I'm curious how one determines that another person is extremely biased against homosexuals or ethnic groups. If a person lives in an all-black neighborhood and attends a black college is he presumptively biased against whites and Hispanics? How does he prove the presumption false? Or would the presumption only apply to white people who live in predominantly white neighborhoods? If so that is evidence of how biased this exercise really is.
Next question: Is holding politically incorrect viewpoints really proof of bias? I submit it is more likely to be just the opposite: evidence of objectivity. A person who does not kowtow to the party line is not necessarily a biased ideologue. He may just be the most objective person around, someone who rejects PC BS and bases his opinions on real evidence rather than simply parrot what is expected of him.
Wouldn't it be something if "homophobia" were hardwired into the male brain as some sort of a survival mechanism through evolution and was therefore as blameless and shameless as, oh, say homosexuality as an expression of genetics is assumed to be......
I wonder if they can add "Spends too much time on FreeRepublic" to the list while they're at it.
I can file for psychological counselling and maybe disability compensation!
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
The eastern block communists used to classify political criminals as mentally ill so they had some justification to send them to the gulags.
So Gay Bashing is suddenly OK now because a perp can't
help it, he just has a mental disorder?