It's Likely the Concerned Alumni of Princeton.
Powerline was on this early today, pointing out that the chief witness on this point from the dims witness list was a "columnist" named Stephen R. Dujack. The dims had a press release that "Dujack will testify about Judge Alito's long-ago 'membership in the Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP). Formed in 1972, CAP has been publicly criticized for its policies opposing Princeton's decision to admit women and minorities.'"
The Powerline piece (
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/012751.php) points to an article by this "columnist" equating eating meat to the holocaust. He's a clear moonbat. Now, can we get any Republican on the committee to ask him to defend that little bit of hyperbole as evidence of why he should be listened to? What Republican Senator's office should we be pushing to pick up this particularly line of questions for their so called witness?
94 posted on
01/06/2006 3:24:46 PM PST by
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)