LOL.
I said I saw a whitewashing of MEK and I'm not the only one that independently saw the same thing. We aren't all "blind".
And let's not forget, you burst on the scene here at FR full of pro-MEK ammunition ready to defend any attacks against the terrorist group. And what about your long lost friend who also burst on the scene full of MEK propaganda, but was banned way back then after only a short time?
Yes, you have some nice historical/pro-American pieces on your blog. Thank you.
LOL. I'm still laughing at your reply. I may have to borrow a line or 2. Maybe there's a tagline in there.
My blog has plenty of ammunition that could be used against the MEK. You’re welcome to use it for that if you wish. When it comes to my research on the MEK, I’ve cataloged an old NCRI platform in order to check it against the one they have now. I've also cataloged a few old interviews that I've found. Again, I have not made any opinion about this material and there are plenty of things within them that I disagree with. But that's not the issue. The issue is that the mere existence of this material on my blog makes you assert that it is a pro-MEK blog. It most certainly is not a pro-MEK blog! It is not an anti-Monarchy blog either. It is simply an informal accumulation of documents to facilitate my musings on different topics. Your perception of my bias is yours and yours alone. The fact that others agree with you is no indication of correctness. In fact it only demonstrates the flaw propagates throughout your consensus body.
Erase the flaw by challenging the assertions therein, not me! Calling me names is like shouting at the moon… I enjoy engaging people who disagree. Either they’ll pull their hair out in frustration or we will begin the long march toward a RESOLUTION together. I hope said RESOLUTION comes before war. No one wants an all out war with Iran. I certainly do not.