Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM Freezes Pensions At End Of Next Year
M$N Money ^ | January 6, 2006

Posted on 01/06/2006 8:36:36 AM PST by Libertarian444

IBM signalled the accelerating demise of guaranteed pensions on Thursday by freezing its defined benefit scheme and forcing all 125,000 US employees into a system based on defined contributions.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.moneycentral.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ibm; pensions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2006 8:36:37 AM PST by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Defined benefit plans should be outlawed in the public sector. They are killing taxpayers who have to fund all the promises that politicians have made to the rank and file and unions for votes.


2 posted on 01/06/2006 8:39:49 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
If Boomers think that their retirements will be as long or as comfortable as were the ones of their parents,they're CRAZY.
3 posted on 01/06/2006 8:42:33 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Defined benefit plans should be outlawed in the public sector. They are killing taxpayers who have to fund all the promises that politicians have made to the rank and file and unions for votes.

Agreed.No government employee...Federal,State,County or Municipal...should be allowed to unionize.

Also,the cushy scheme that Congress crafted for itself long ago should be dismantled and replaced with something that more closely resembles what their constituents get.

4 posted on 01/06/2006 8:45:57 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Depends. If you have two or three million in financial assets at age 60, you should be OK.


5 posted on 01/06/2006 8:46:27 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Too bad for all those IBM employees.


6 posted on 01/06/2006 8:47:02 AM PST by soccer_maniac (Do some good while browsing FR --> Join Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Federal unions have no impact upon pensions. That doesn't mean they are worthwhile but irrelevent wrt this issue.


7 posted on 01/06/2006 8:47:46 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user


HAHHAHAHAHAH...no doubt about that.


8 posted on 01/06/2006 8:48:35 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac

Those employees should be rejoicing. Defined benefit plans are inferior to the defined contribution contracts, because of inflexibility and high administration costs.
You won't ever see millionaires in defined benefit plans, but millions in defined contributions.


9 posted on 01/06/2006 8:52:22 AM PST by americanbychoice2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Defined benefit plans have been converting into defined contribution plans for at least 20 years. I've wondered if the percentage of conversions has gone up suddenly because I'm hearing more about it now.


10 posted on 01/06/2006 8:53:07 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

If the assets are all in stocks they will be in trouble. As the boomers start retiring in the millions, they will have to sell stocks and that will cause the market to go down on a sustained basis. Unless the 401 K lawas are changed retiress are required to withdraw a certain portion of their holdings every year and there will be more sellers than buyers starting about 2012.


11 posted on 01/06/2006 8:53:33 AM PST by Maneesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

2-3 million. Well here I start, 1 penny, 2 pennies, 3 pennies. Man that is a lot of dough. I can't imagine too many people having that much even with the house. I still have 25 years or so but so many who were hoping for the pensions are going to be in such trouble.


12 posted on 01/06/2006 8:54:59 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice2

It depends on the age of the employee. DC are great for younger workers. But for the older worker who does not have long to build up the accounts when the conversion is made as they near retirement, it often works out to be a smaller pension. I do feel for these older workers who have been told for years that they would have such and such an amount based on the DB formula. Everyone will be better off as a whole eventually with DC plans.


13 posted on 01/06/2006 8:56:35 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: twigs

The mass of defined benefits are in the public sector. The private secotr has been abolishing them over the past decade because they know they are a financial anchor, look at GM.


14 posted on 01/06/2006 8:57:34 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh

The laws are just fine as they are.
You do not have a mandatory minimum withdrawal until age 70. Then it is based on expected mortality. I see no problem.


15 posted on 01/06/2006 8:59:50 AM PST by americanbychoice2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

When I worked for our local government, we had a DB plan and great benefits. That's why people work for the government. The pay is much lower than they could have gotten in private industry. While I believe that there's a lot of waste in government, good employees are needed. They need a good pension plan, whatever that may be. Since defined contributions are often based on profits, public sector managers need to develop a fair way to configure pension plans.


16 posted on 01/06/2006 9:00:08 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh

The laws are just fine as they are.
You do not have a mandatory minimum withdrawal until age 70. Then it is based on expected mortality. I see no problem.


17 posted on 01/06/2006 9:00:26 AM PST by americanbychoice2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Yes, I used to administrate those conversions. After ERISA was passed in 1984, we began to see a lot of them.


18 posted on 01/06/2006 9:01:10 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
"IBM signalled the accelerating demise of guaranteed pensions on Thursday by freezing its defined benefit scheme and forcing all 125,000 US employees into a system based on defined contributions."

I actually thought defined benefit was already a thing of the past in the private sector.

-Eric

19 posted on 01/06/2006 9:01:58 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maneesh

I just read that a new law was passed that is similar to 401Ks, but used after-tax money. Another feature was that there were no requirements to begin withdrawing at a certain time. I forget the other features of it.


20 posted on 01/06/2006 9:03:01 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson