Skip to comments.
Democrats To Delay Alito's Committee Confirmation Vote
wchs6 ^
| Jan 5, 2006
| staff
Posted on 01/05/2006 2:46:12 PM PST by wouldntbprudent
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: prairiebreeze
And how he "wrote" that (satire but interpreted as fact) article
41
posted on
01/16/2006 4:06:04 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: TheBattman
Maybe now they won't be able to run away
42
posted on
01/16/2006 4:09:19 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: BigSkyFreeper
43
posted on
01/16/2006 4:24:59 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: Mo1
Why is it that republicans have to play by the rules???
spineless.
44
posted on
01/16/2006 7:26:36 AM PST
by
fhlh
(Polls are for strippers and liberal spinsters.)
To: fhlh
45
posted on
01/16/2006 7:29:45 AM PST
by
Dr. Scarpetta
(Democrats would vote against Jesus Christ for the Supreme Court.)
To: fhlh
Why is it that republicans have to play by the rules??? Because otherwise we'd be like the Democrats
46
posted on
01/16/2006 8:57:35 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: rirepublican
Correct me if I'm wrong. As I understood it, the Dem's already had their week when the hearing was rescheduled. I believe it was to begin right after the new year. At least that was what I thought I heard at the end of the hearings I was wrong in my post to you .. You are correct
FNC just showed a clip from back in November and the agreement between Specter and Leahy about the week delay being in the beginning of the hearings .. not after
But the other Dems didn't honor that agreement and basically said .. Leahey's words means nothing and calling for the Rule for a one week delay
47
posted on
01/16/2006 4:10:58 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Mo1
They are trying to delay this appointment to the court because there are a couple big cases coming up I was just going to ask that question. Alito's confirmation is a foregone conclusion -- ergo the only reason the Dems are stalling is because there must be a case (or cases) they want Sandy O to rule on. Anyone have any insight as to which cases are pushing the Dems to do this?
48
posted on
01/16/2006 4:15:30 PM PST
by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: Mo1
This nothing. Wait until we get a 3rd nominee. There will be fireworks.
49
posted on
01/16/2006 4:16:10 PM PST
by
AGreatPer
(Steelers will win it all this year. Bring on the Broncos)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson