Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

He's 17 that would be legal in some states.... this isn't nearly like the case with the 40 year old and the 12 year old... she is stupid and should be fired but I don't see the point of taking up prison space with her.


3 posted on 01/05/2006 1:54:50 PM PST by gondramB (Democracy: two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch. Liberty: a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

I know where you're coming from, but I disagree with your premis. This woman was 35, he was 17. Besides the "sick" factor here, its IS against the law. If we start watering down sentencing because some states are more permissive than others, the respect for the law becomes a joke. Absolutely no teacher in K-12 should ever under any circumstance be allowed to have sex with a student. Period. I don't care if you have a 19 year old on his third try at senior year. Teachers are in a position of authority and like any other workplace, authority is too easily abused and should be prohibited.


17 posted on 01/05/2006 2:00:49 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

"He's 17 that would be legal in some states.... this isn't nearly like the case with the 40 year old and the 12 year old... she is stupid and should be fired but I don't see the point of taking up prison space with her."

It's legal in California, too, but it's against the law for teachers to have sex with minor students. That's why the unlawful sexual intercourse charge.

Otherwise, 17 year olds can rut as they choose.


18 posted on 01/05/2006 2:01:26 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson