Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teenyelliott

The point is producing educated, literate, socially functional children at the end of the process. As long as government accepts the notion that public money should go toward that end, why shouldn't parents have a say in how those public funds are expended on their children? You want your children to go to public schools? Fine. That's your *choice.* But why shouldn't I get the equivalent of what the government pays out for Average Daily Attendance for educating your kids so that I can exercise my *choice* on where my kids are educated? Forcing public education as the only choice is closer to your socialism characterization.


29 posted on 01/05/2006 2:29:35 PM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents

"As long as government accepts the notion that public money should go toward that end, why shouldn't parents have a say in how those public funds are expended on their children?"

If they did, the liberal stranglehold on the next generation would cease.


35 posted on 01/05/2006 2:36:00 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson