This is the guy whose name is plastered all over the news today as being willing to testify in the "NSA wiretapping" matter before Congress.
Point is, he has a prior "whistleblowing" history, making a false claim of "spying" against a former colleague.
True, but he can't deliver the goods. In order to testify you need testimony. He has none.
Besides, if a wild eyed kook like him becomes the face people associate with the liberals and their opposition to protecting the country, I don't have a problem with it.