Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: new yorker 77

don't get too excited folks, the key part in the article is:

"The high court said it would decide later whether to review Padilla's challenge to his military detention."

that is the crux of this case - whether the SCOTUS will toss the enemy combatant designation entirely. they will still rule on that matter at a later time apparently.

for now, it means Padilla goes to court on these lesser charges in civilian court. let's just hope its not another Sammi Al Arian type jury of Floridians empaneled. Padilla could still walk on all of this.


24 posted on 01/04/2006 1:43:14 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

Doom and gloom as usual Oceanview.


71 posted on 01/04/2006 2:22:38 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson