Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElectricStrawberry
My intention here is not to say that the discussion of ID doesn't belong in the SCHOOL, just that it belongs in a non-science class like philosophy or theology (if they even teach that any more). Science classes are for teaching science and scientific thinking, not for debating baseless and unprovable hypotheses.

But should not this matter be left to the local citizens and elected school boards? Yes they can be mistaken and surely they will be on occasion, but so can be the courts and ACLU. The courts are not infallible and they should not usurp the whole power.

53 posted on 01/04/2006 2:40:09 PM PST by A. Pole (If the lettuce cutters were paid $10 more per hour, the lettuce heads would cost FIVE CENTS more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole
But should not this matter be left to the local citizens and elected school boards?

Not when it violates the Constitution. If establishing sectarian religious doctrine, like I.D., with no basis in science as the favored theory of the school district does not violate the establishment clause, nothing does.

71 posted on 01/04/2006 4:42:28 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole
But should not this matter be left to the local citizens and elected school boards?

Not when it violates the Constitution. If establishing sectarian religious doctrine, like I.D., with no basis in science as the favored theory of the school district does not violate the establishment clause, nothing does.

72 posted on 01/04/2006 4:42:28 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole

The matter of "should ID be discussed in a SCIENCE room" shoudn't even be discussed by a local school board. ID is not SCIENCE in any manner. If you want to introduce your spirituality based topics into the school curriculum, do so in a theology or philosophy class and I'll have no problem with it. Whether or not you like it, our courts DO have a certain amount of power over the incorrect decisions of local governments. As a biologist, it's an affront to the science to introduce completely unscientific notions into a scientific class and theory just because there may be gaps or specific problems with a theory. Can't just fill in the gaps with the latest scientifically unproven and unprovable religious belief.....not in MY science class.


88 posted on 01/05/2006 6:27:00 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole
The courts are not infallible and they should not usurp the whole power.

....and school boards ARE infallible and SHOULD be able to introduce whatever they want into any class they want, no matter the relevance to the class?

89 posted on 01/05/2006 6:33:06 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson