Skip to comments.
Anti-Alito push fails to sway U.S.
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^
| 4 January 2006
| Charles Hurt
Posted on 01/04/2006 4:50:43 AM PST by rdb3
The Washington Timeswww.washingtontimes.com
By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published January 4, 2006
Despite a major coordinated campaign, liberal interest groups have failed to convince the American public that the Senate should reject Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Every major poll indicates that far more voters think Judge Alito should be confirmed than think he should be rejected. Though that support generally is lower than it was for John G. Roberts Jr. before his confirmation for chief justice in the fall, it is on par with the public support for Supreme Court nominees during the past 20 years.
"Since the nomination of Samuel Alito, left-wing groups have lashed out at him through a number of avenues in an attempt to derail his nomination," conservative activists Sean Rushton and Joseph Cella said in a memo to supporters. "The left's campaign has involved television, radio, print and Internet campaigns, public statements, the issuing of reports, and a van-based road tour. In all these media, the left failed to generate any substantive opposition to Judge Alito."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: alito; confirmation; scalito
The Left won't stop. Get Alito confirmed as soon as possible.

Dittohead, Snow Flake, and Bushbot, so what of it?
1
posted on
01/04/2006 4:50:45 AM PST
by
rdb3
To: rdb3
Many people are getting tired of the daily rhetoric from the left in this country.
Their personal destruction techniques are getting old.
To: rdb3
These polls were all taken before they trot out some young lady or man saying that Judge Alito propositioned them. Waiting for some shoe to drop. The left know that everything hangs in the balance on these court picks and with Alito we are replacing a soft moderate (O'Conner) with a decidedly more conservative one. There will be shoes that will drop over the next 2 months.
3
posted on
01/04/2006 5:40:55 AM PST
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
To: rdb3
John Batchelor last night asked which matter the Judiciary Committee will take up first, the Alito confirmation or the witch hunt into the President's authority re the NSA "domestic spying scandal." I think we'll see a full court press by the Dims and the media this week and this weekend on Specter, trying to get the Alito hearings delayed again. Besides giving them yet more time to find something to smear Alito with (doubtful at this stage, given they've had two months and have come upo with zip), they can attack the President and try to drag his numbers down again, thus weakening Alito. It's all they have.
4
posted on
01/04/2006 6:17:21 AM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: Tennessean4Bush
"These polls were all taken before they trot out some young lady or man saying that Judge Alito propositioned them."
'He turned me into a newt!'
'well... it got better!'
5
posted on
01/04/2006 6:40:59 AM PST
by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: Tennessean4Bush
So they're dusting off Anita Hill right now...BTW where has she been lately? She should have went to prison.
To: rdb3
Dems better think carefully about this. Bush will probably be picking a 3rd nominee and probably to replace Ginsburg who is not looking or sounding healthy. They can pick their fight now against a conservative replacing O'Conner (or Rhenquist depending on how you see it) OR they save it for later for a true ideological shift. But as libs, they are unable to understand the principle of 'DeLayed gratification'...and they'll probably blow it all on this pick.
To: right-wingin_It
They can pick their fight now against a conservative replacing O'Conner (or Rhenquist depending on how you see it) OR they save it for later for a true ideological shift. But as libs, they are unable to understand the principle of 'DeLayed gratification'...and they'll probably blow it all on this pick.They always overreach.

Dittohead, Snow Flake, and Bushbot, so what of it?
8
posted on
01/04/2006 7:57:33 AM PST
by
rdb3
(This is a ch__ch. What's missing?)
To: adam_az
9
posted on
01/04/2006 12:14:41 PM PST
by
thulldud
("Muslim Community Leaders Warn of Backlash from Tomorrow's Terrorist Attack")
To: adam_az
DEMS crying extreme wolf is getting old.
10
posted on
01/04/2006 12:16:47 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Evolution is a myth -- Libertarians just won't evolve into Conservatives.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson