1 posted on
01/03/2006 6:26:12 PM PST by
blam
To: SunkenCiv; RightWhale
2 posted on
01/03/2006 6:27:01 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
The Fuentes Magna?
3 posted on
01/03/2006 6:31:06 PM PST by
FReepaholic
(Admitted FReepaholic since 1998.)
To: blam
It seems we are being flooded with new discoveries. This one sounds like it is going to change the rules.
4 posted on
01/03/2006 6:36:33 PM PST by
winodog
To: blam
When an author can't get a simple fact right, like the difference between a "reed" and a "rod" in modern measurement, I tend to lose interest and to question more esoteric facts about which I know a lot less...
In the modern world, the "rod" is still a recognized unit of land measurement, being used extensively in the 19th and early 20th century, but I have never heard of a "reed", even by reference.
6 posted on
01/03/2006 6:45:47 PM PST by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: blam
The provenance of this artifact has been seriously compromised. When exactly it was found is not mentioned; all we know is that it was pre-1958. Establishing age by inference is probably the wildest varying method in the universe. It could end up being 100 years old, or 100,000. Nothing in the article suggests any serious attempts at truly scientific dating, so that aspect is inconclusive.
Finally, why hasn't the "proto-cuneiform" been totally photographed or documented by transcription?
All is not well with this Fuente Magna.
8 posted on
01/03/2006 6:54:52 PM PST by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: blam
Maybe we got the story of Atlantis backward. Remember that Bolivia is at a high altitude compared to sea level.
Perhaps Atlantis (Bolivia) didn't sink--but the country around it did!
Or maybe Atlantis/Bolivia rose instead of sinking.
Or maybe...
10 posted on
01/03/2006 7:09:33 PM PST by
wildbill
To: blam
Alas, we had a topic about this, just saw it this morning while cruisin' the keyword "PERU" here on FR. I'm inclined to believe those marks on the item are representations of something akin to quipu. Let's see...
The Monolith of Pokotia (Sumerian Language etched on Ancient Mesopotamian Items)!
Bernardo Biadós Yacovazzo & Freddy Arce, | FR Post 10-19-2002
Posted on 10/19/2002 10:28:48 AM PDT by vannrox
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/772170/posts
12 posted on
01/03/2006 11:38:19 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/pledge)
13 posted on
01/03/2006 11:41:03 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/pledge)
To: blam
There are 5000 year old Egyptian hieroglyphs in the Australian outback.
14 posted on
01/04/2006 10:30:30 AM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: blam; martin_fierro
I prefer the Fuente Opus X.
19 posted on
01/04/2006 12:02:05 PM PST by
Tijeras_Slim
("We're a meat-based society.")
To: blam
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson