Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit

Marina tied Oswald to the Walker shooting. Testimony she has never refuted.

You don't believe Latimer - why - he doesn't support your conclusions. Not convincing.

As I wrote when he met with his mother, wife and brother he never claimed to be a patsy, innocent or a victim. He was cool and cocky.

He was not in front of the TBD. That photo was debunked decades ago.

Again we have photographic evidence he owned the gun. Marina took 3 pictures of him with it - photos verified by experts in the WC and House investigations. She has never refuted that fact.

The story of the military officer controlling the autopsy is total crap put forth by Oliver Stone. Please don't tell me you believe anything that idiot says. That was one of the funniest scenes in that unintentionally funny movie.

Luck, chance, whatever, play a enormous role in every major event. For example, if Oswald had not requested a change of clothes prior to being moved Ruby would never have had a chance to shoot him. It delayed his departure by twenty minutes, a time by the way when Ruby was witnessed sending money to a stripper at a currency exchange. But then maybe Oswald was in on his own murder.


203 posted on 01/11/2006 11:35:19 AM PST by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: DHerion

The military officer at the autopsy was not the invention of Oliver Stone but had been in circulation for over a decade before he even thought of making a movie. Stone just dramatized it. He didn't use his own ideas for much of the movie only those of others.

I do not assume that Ruby would have stopped trying to kill Oswald had it not been possible to do so when it was. From all appearances he had been stalking him and was kicked out of places in the police station where he would have had access to Oswald before the 24th.

I made the point that the debunking of the "Oswald in front" theory was something that had NOT been done in the other sightings.

Lattimer is not credible because his theory is nonsense from top to bottom. Dan Rather has more credibility.

Where did I ever dispute Oswald owning the rifle? Merely that IT was not capable of doing the job as found.


204 posted on 01/11/2006 12:48:17 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson