Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DHerion

I'm not using the film to determine the trajectory... The 3-D object, JFK's body, shows the entry and exit wounds. You can't move those wounds. They establish a point A and a point B. All you need then is the position of the body.

The film shows the postion of the body, not the trajectory, but knowing the enty/exit wound locations one can extrapolate a direction. The wound angle is too flat. His body is too upright. The visual evidence (wounds & body position) does not match the proposed trajectory from that window.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I don't know who killed him, but there is no way the repository window lines up with that wound given the visual evidence.

jw


191 posted on 01/09/2006 12:40:02 PM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: JWinNC

Well, other people, including an Australian documentary film crew who reinacted the shooting claim otherwise. Other than a CBS documentary done in the 70s I think no one has even attempted to reproduce the shooting.

Dale K. Myers using films, photos, autopsy reports, surveyor plans, etc. also states otherwise. Have you gone to the trouble of doing this? My guess is no. It apparently took months to accomplish.

His work was independently checked by experts from Z-Axis Corporation, a company that does analysis of events like plane crashes.

You must be a conspiracy theorist since to believe someone other than Oswald shot the President makes it a conspiracy.


192 posted on 01/09/2006 2:15:15 PM PST by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson