Yes, thats what clinton did, but it states "Pursuant to section 302(a)(1)"
The problem is that I've read that that section requires the Attorney General to certify is the search will not involve "the premises, information, material, or property of a United States person." Can someone link?
P.S. I'm in agreement Bush has the power, FISA imho is trying to undermine the constitution.
I believe that EO recapitualtes a different section of FISA. 50 USC 1802 relates to electronic surveillance, 50 USC 1821 relates to physical searches, both are part of FISA.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/RL30465.pdf <- good summary of the act
http://www.mail-archive.com/volokh@lists.powerblogs.com/msg05152.html <- decent analysis
Executive orders are not law nor do they amend law.
This was a directive from one president that resolved, to his satisfaction, the conflict between FISA and his inherent powers.
Nonetheless it's good to remind people that Dem- and all- presidents had the same view as president Bush. The media never will!