To: Antoninus
By appearance alone, one is forced to conclude that the species has remained practically identical to its fossilized progenitors.
If by "practically identical" you mean "smaller and with internal structures not found in its ancestors" then sure.
207 posted on
01/04/2006 9:07:54 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Larger. Modern coelacanth is much larger than its ancient relatives. </nitpick>
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson