Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005
Carbon-14 is only reliable back to what, 50,000 years? But that isn't always that they believed, right?
779 posted on 01/05/2006 8:27:55 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies ]


To: mlc9852
Carbon-14 is only reliable back to what, 50,000 years? But that isn't always that they believed, right?

Carbon 14 dating used to be reliable back to about 35,000-40,000 years, but advances in shielding and now AMS dating have extended it to about 50,000 years. They are also working on advances which may make 80,000 years possible, but that is still a few years away most likely.

This is one of my fields, so let me know if you have any other questions.

782 posted on 01/05/2006 8:34:07 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Carbon-14 is only reliable back to what, 50,000 years? But that isn't always that they believed, right?

C-14 is only accurate to about 50,000 years. The decays of other elements are used to determine older dates. Potassium-argon dating for example, is reliable back to hundreds of millions of years; Uranium and lead trapped in zircon crystals can give dates going back billions of years. Elements that are used to date more ancient ages are conversely not accurate for more recent dating, which is why Carbon-14 is relied on to date relatively recent prehistoric artifacts.

789 posted on 01/05/2006 8:47:10 AM PST by Quark2005 (Divination is NOT science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson