[JCEccles]

The "science" of Darwinian materialism is in deep trouble, PH. It is hemorrhaging because it cannot answer simple questions posed by Intelligent Design. This silly little bandaid applied to the gaping wound by a small-minded angry little frump of a judge isn't going to make the slightest bit of difference over the long haul.

[Dimensio]

It is hemorrhaging because it cannot answer simple questions posed by Intelligent Design.
rather thoroughly answered. It may be true that some people don't like the answers, but given that an answer has been offered, they should at least attempt to explain where they find fault.

[Dimensio]

Argh. My post was malformed because of bad HTML.

It is hemorrhaging because it cannot answer simple questions posed by Intelligent Design.

What questions? The only "question" I've seen is "how can 'irreducably complex' structures evolve without intelligent intervention", and that question has been rather thoroughly answered. It may be true that some people don't like the answers, but given that an answer has been offered, they should at least attempt to explain where they find fault.

[GSlob]

"This silly little bandaid applied to the gaping wound by a small-minded angry little frump of a judge isn't going to make the slightest bit of difference over the long haul."
Learn to lose with class. Ad hominem [name-calling] arguments are fellatious.