Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Awaiting Next Word in 17-Year-Old Murder Case
NY Times ^ | January 3, 2006 | BRUCE LAMBERT

Posted on 01/03/2006 4:31:06 AM PST by Pharmboy


Ruby Washington/The New York Times
Martin H. Tankleff, photographed
in 2004, was convicted in 1990 of
killing his parents. He turned 34 in
August 2005 and has expressed
hope that he will not spend
another birthday in prison.

Martin H. Tankleff was supposed to start his senior year of high school on Sept. 7, 1988. But before dawn, his parents were bludgeoned and stabbed during a rampage in their home on a cliff overlooking Long Island Sound.

Within hours he was arrested, based on a confession that was handwritten by a detective, which Mr. Tankleff promptly repudiated and never signed. Still, it sealed his fate. In 1990 a jury convicted him of double murder, and he began serving two consecutive terms of 25 years to life in prison. He appealed, in vain, all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

snip

Besides disputing the validity of the confession, his lawyers called 21 witnesses in a presentation of a new body of evidence, including an alternative theory of what happened that September night. Mr. Tankleff's lawyers accused his father's business partner and three former convicts of being the real killers. One admitted in an affidavit to being the getaway driver. Several witnesses said two others privately admitted their involvement, including one who told his son, "Yes, I did it."

snip

Criminal law experts have also focused on the case, citing it as a classic miscarriage of justice. They say it has the earmarks of wrongful conviction, with a false confession, dubious police work and a prosecutor's conflicts of interest.

"I never saw a similar case where a defendant was so obviously innocent," said Herbert A. Posner, a retired State Supreme Court justice who is following the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: injustice; longisland; murder; retrial
How could justice appear to go so bad? There were leads ignored, people not questioned...beyond belief. This guy is innocent, it seems.
1 posted on 01/03/2006 4:31:10 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thefactor; aculeus; durasell; NYer; wtc911

Thought you might be interested in this incredible story...


2 posted on 01/03/2006 4:34:06 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Every once in awhile something crops up in the news about it. A weird case, but really has not resonance for me.


3 posted on 01/03/2006 4:41:23 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

It is like I have told my children, respect the police, but always remember, they are not your friends...


4 posted on 01/03/2006 4:48:08 AM PST by joe fonebone (Thin skinned people make me sick!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

It is like I have told my children, respect the police, but always remember, they are not your friends...


depends on what bars you drink in.


5 posted on 01/03/2006 4:49:14 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Sorry about the ping, then...


6 posted on 01/03/2006 5:15:27 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Yes, it robbed a valuable nine seconds out of my normally hectic day.


7 posted on 01/03/2006 5:52:03 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: durasell

It shan't happen again...


8 posted on 01/03/2006 5:54:35 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

The interesting thing about crime is that there is always less there than meets the eye.

For instance, serial killers aren't "evil" beyond being guys with heads filled with bad wiring. They're basically busted radios.

Crime and criminals tend to be small, banal and unpleasant.


9 posted on 01/03/2006 5:59:05 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: durasell

The focus for me here were the bad cops and prosecutors...


10 posted on 01/03/2006 6:01:16 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Long Island.


11 posted on 01/03/2006 6:05:51 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Steven A. Drizin, legal director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University, who studied the Tankleff case, said: "Unfortunately, in almost every wrongful conviction case, even when DNA excludes the suspect, law enforcement officers - whether blinded by tunnel vision, whether they don't want to admit a mistake, whether from fear of civil liability - they remain fixated on preserving a conviction, even in the face of compelling contrary evidence. That's the saddest thing in these cases."

No the saddest thing is the support the prosecutors give the cops. American lawyers are committed to the adversary system leading too many prosecutors to turning a deaf ear to logic and evidence. Even prosecutors of those horrible false memory child abuse cases insist to this day that the crimes occurred and the defendants were guilty.

Of course the other side does the same thing. See, for example, anything ever said by Simpson's attorneys following his acquittal.

12 posted on 01/03/2006 6:07:36 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
See, for example, anything ever said by Simpson's attorneys following his acquittal.

As if the evidence couldn't have proved OJ did it, watch that clip of the reading of the verdict the msm shows every once in a while. The short guy (whatshisname and ex-friend) on the bottom left of the tv screen shows it all in his expression. He's totally crushed. You actually see his body language screaming out, "OMG, what have we done, the guy is guilty as hell." It played out after the trial too since he doesn't speak to OJ now.

13 posted on 01/03/2006 6:25:33 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Now I see why hasn't had any print space to devote to its treasonous NSA leak story...
14 posted on 01/03/2006 10:48:22 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson