To: Lizavetta
It was like reading an I Love Lucy episode, only fancier.
"Oh, look, they are going to get caught. Oh, look, they got away. Oh, look, they are going to get caught. Oh,look, . . .
And then the ending: "Hey, let's get together later and have sex."
"Okay."
The End.
Fabulous writing. The stuff of legend. Or at least worthy of making a stupid movie.
11 posted on
01/02/2006 1:15:15 PM PST by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: teenyelliott
Hey, has anyone here read The Lost Painting about a missing Carraveggio? I think the author is Jonathan Harr or something like that.
To: teenyelliott
I thought the same thing about the ending. The story had a great lead up and wove in some interesting history, but the end just fell flat. It was like Dan Brown got tired of writing and just decided to end the book as fast as he could.
I'm surprised that the focus of the next book will be on the Masons considering that "National Treasure" was releasesd not too long ago.
19 posted on
01/02/2006 1:39:52 PM PST by
GovGirl
(Newsweek lied, people died...can we make that into a t-shirt?)
To: teenyelliott
Me think you and Lizavetta should stick to "The lone Ranger" and the "Roadrunner" and leave Dan Brown's writing to us that like good mystery and conspiracy writing.
I got all of Dan Brown's books and will likely buy the next one to
25 posted on
01/02/2006 2:03:41 PM PST by
munin
( I support the war on Muslim terror and GWB)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson