Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc
Who cares what they wanted. Perot took 19% after he bailed. Clinton couldn't even get a simple majority in two terms. Perot disaffected his base and much of his following when he bailed initially and still got 19%. It was unheard of; but, the guy had popular support. If it hadn't been for the dirty tricks, he'd have won. Plain and simple.

LOL!

If he hadn't bailed in the first place he(Perot) might have won.(BTW, Perot basically said that he was bailing because clinton was leading).

Oh that's right, Perot bailing the first time in 92, was due to "Republican dirty tricks".

LOL!, again.

160 posted on 01/02/2006 10:49:11 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
Oh that's right, Perot bailing the first time in 92, was due to "Republican dirty tricks".

That's what really cost him. If he'd stayed in, who knows? (Although his kookiness, which basically made him unfit, probably was bound to come out.)

184 posted on 01/02/2006 12:14:06 PM PST by Huck (Don't Vote: It only encourages them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson