Replies

I know you love GW Bush more then life itself, but we live in the United States of America. If I want to exercise my right to free speech and engage in political dissent, I will do so. I cherish my Constitutional right to express myself and neither you nor anyone else will stifle my comments. If speaking openly about the downside of the Bush Presidency upsets you so much, too bad. The Founding Fathers upset a lot of folks too. I'm in good company.

You really need to get a grip on yourself. Bush is no saint and he's not perfect. Bad policy decisions have been made by this President and the GOP controlled Congress. Opportunities to advance a more conservative agenda for America have been tossed away in favor of more spending on social welfare and entitlement programs, expansion of the federal bureaucracy and total opposition to real immigration reform. Those are the facts and that is the truth. Obviosuly, you can't handle the truth.

OK........your first sentence is filled with absurd histrionics (and so is everything else that follows), so cut it out. Try to think and respond rationally, OK?

I'm not restricting your free speech. I'm wondering why you drew conclusions about the President's legacy based on media speculation.

Answer my question without the ludicrous emotional outbursts. I want to get inside your brain, and see how it functions.

What makes a person like you draw extreme conclusions based on media speculation? What makes you consistently side with the media against the President?

If you can't be rational, then don't bother to respond. I know you're capable of rational discussion at some level, but this post of yours sounds like you're 9 years old.

I'm looking for a serious and logical answer to your response to Kristol's hypothesis. I don't want to be subjected to your childish and defensive non-responses. If I lost my ability to reason (as you appear to have done), I might just start to think that YOU were attempting to deny ME my freedom of speech.

I know you love GW Bush more then life itself

At least she believes in SOMETHING, rather than being AGAINST everything.

The vacuousness of your responses is proven by the PERSONAL attacks you made on these two Freepers.

But that's not big news around here.