Replies

You know what this reminds me of? It reminds me of back when Clinton was taking sexual gratuities from a certain intern of his, and how he said that his personal life had NOTHING to do with this professional life!

These things which we discuss are about indicators of character! One's character should be reasonably unchanging no matter what the situation! Of course, people make slip ups now and then. We're not perfect people, but the normal and "right" response is to give a heartfelt and humble appology, fix what we can, and get on with it.

But former CINCs pursue their employees for sexual gratification, and say that the action can rightfully be divided from what's "important". In the same manner, conservative talkshow hosts hawk everything from matresses to hearing aids and SWEAR it to be true, except with politics where they are EXPERTS and expect us to absorb every word as the ultimate truth. The same goes for scientists who expect me to believe that they have any sane or accurate method of determining what the state of the earth was 100 million years ago, and think that we can't see their overt agenda.

Like I was saying before....it's a big issue of conflict of interest in all three cases....the the perverted CINC, the talkshow host hawker, and the scientist.