What a load of donkey dung, just like the liberals excused old bjclinton's saying he could compartmentalized his public behavior from his private so have you in walling off the origins of life.
Don't the people who work on a theory, and in a particular field, have the right to limit their study to that field? You don't gripe about a football player who doesn't want to play rugby, do you?
It seems like you are upset because you (the broad you, not necessarily you in particular) got all geared up to do heated battle with "evilution" over the origin of life, and now you feel snookered when you finally learn that evolution doesn't deal with the origin of life.
I can hear it now...
"Too bad, we came to fight, we'll make 'em deal with it anyway. Then we'll get 'em for sure!"
No it's not. It is your fault that you are attacking the ToE on the basis that you say it says something that it doesn't however.
"What a load of donkey dung, just like the liberals excused old bjclinton's saying he could compartmentalized his public behavior from his private so have you in walling off the origins of life."
It's only 'compartmentalised' in the same way as any scientific or academic pursuit that doesn't deal in the origin of life. Theories of gravity don't reference the origin of life. Theories of plate tectonics don't reference the origin of life. Teaching of english literature typically doesn't feel the need to explore first where the human race that provided the authors came from. Your argument is absurd.