You mean you didn't write that evolution was not a tool to get atheism into schools?
It's interesting you should complain about me misreading you when you clearly did the same thing in reverse back at #124 (most likely deliberately).
Once again, you are correct: I did not write that evolution was not a tool to get atheism into schools. I don't know that it is, therefore I would not have asserted something that I do not know to be true.
Having taught (briefly) in a public school, I don't have that much confidence in the ability of most teachers to teach something that is not clearly lined out in the curriculum. These are people who do not think out of the box. In fact, they like being in the box.
Additionally, since I am actually familiar with current science textbooks and curriculum, I don't find that your statement that atheism is being taught is accurate. Just ain't so.
If you could present some actual documentation to back up your assertions, I would be happy to see them.