Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan further preparing for China with the US
Japan Times ^

Posted on 12/31/2005 5:27:06 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME

TOKYO — In efforts to strengthen defenses against potential Chinese intrusion into Okinawa Prefecture's outlying islands, the Self-Defense Forces are taking such steps as conducting joint exercises with the U.S. Marine Corps and developing a short-range torpedo tailored for this purpose, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported Saturday.

The Defense Agency and the SDF envision a scenario in which China — faced with domestic discontent stemming from such factors as economic disparities within the country — intrudes into Japanese territorial waters around the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea to relieve internal pressure, the report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at crisscross.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: englishas2ndlanguage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Here is another link to the same story. This is good news. the chinese have been going in japanese territorial waters and flying close to their airspace recently. Seems like they are probing defenses. Things could heat up fast in the new year.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051231/ap_on_re_as/japan_china;_ylt=Asdf6Mm92OXzN6GlRcKM8sIBxg8F;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--

1 posted on 12/31/2005 5:27:08 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051231/ap_on_re_as/japan_china;_ylt=Asdf6Mm92OXzN6GlRcKM8sIBxg8F;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--


2 posted on 12/31/2005 5:27:19 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
Japan further preparing for China with the US

WHAT YOU SAY ...!

3 posted on 12/31/2005 5:30:15 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

BTTT


4 posted on 12/31/2005 5:30:25 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English press one. (Farewell Tookie. Is hell really hot?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

I think the Japanese would mop the floor with the Chinese, but then I'm no expert in this field. From what I've read all Japanese planes and ships are really new, and most Chinese stuff is old junk, new purchases notwithstanding. And of course, we all know the historical track record between these two. Japan would have exterminated China, if not for the US. For that matter, Germany would have exterminated China, if not for the US.


5 posted on 12/31/2005 5:31:38 AM PST by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Expect some justification from China for this
behavior. I predict that the rape of
Nanking will be offered a reason for payback.


6 posted on 12/31/2005 5:37:54 AM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Is there a word missing in the headline?


7 posted on 12/31/2005 5:41:56 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Probably I was typing fast at work. :)


8 posted on 12/31/2005 5:45:06 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: starbase
I think the Japanese would mop the floor with the Chinese

You have a good basis, but Japan has a few problems if it comes to a fight with China, at least in the short term.

1. They lack offensive weapons. Of course its hard to purely define defensive vs. offensive, but they lack particular weapons such as cruise missiles and SRBMs and that would put them at a disadvantage.

2. No nukes. Now they can make nukes, but future capability won't mean much if the Chinese threaten a massive strike. The Japanese would have to be at least a bit worried about whether the threat of U.S. nuclear retaliation would be enough. Also China has ICBMs and SRBMs that can hit Japan. Japan again has the capability to build them, but none on hand.

9 posted on 12/31/2005 6:44:12 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
The Japanese would have to be at least a bit worried about whether the threat of U.S. nuclear retaliation would be enough. Also China has ICBMs and SRBMs that can hit Japan. Japan again has the capability to build them, but none on hand.

Well, do you differentiate at all between a conventional conflict and a "final battle"? What if it was purely conventional, how would you see that unfolding?
10 posted on 12/31/2005 6:57:38 AM PST by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: starbase

In any sort of conventional air/sea battle the Japanese would indeed annihilate the Chinese, even with no US help.

Only thing the Chinese have going for them is having nukes and the Japanese not having them (though I've seen credible speculation that the Japanese could have functioning nukes within 6 months of a decision to build them.

China isn't going to nuke Japan over a few rocks off Okinawa, however.


11 posted on 12/31/2005 7:25:34 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I'm for reinstituting the Lend-Lease program.


12 posted on 12/31/2005 7:27:26 AM PST by 308MBR (Not only older, but bolder. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: starbase
Well, do you differentiate at all between a conventional conflict and a "final battle"? What if it was purely conventional, how would you see that unfolding?

The Chinese have a very limited ability (nonnuclear) to take the fight to the Japanese homeland, and the Japanese defenses are good. The Chinese could make some use of their SRBMs, after relocating them, without any threat of similar retaliation. But these SRBMs would be less than decisive.

In a fight close to the Chinese shores, the Japanese would probably suffer some significant naval losses. A realistic clash would be naval and in waters distant from Japan, and closer to China, perhaps within the range of land based aircraft. This would be a tough fight for Japan. China's SS-N-22's and high number of C802s give them an ASCM advantage over Japan.

13 posted on 12/31/2005 7:29:46 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
I'm for reinstituting the Lend-Lease program.

We shoot a Trident over Japan on the way to China. At apex, the Japanese take possession until impact, at which time they give up possession.

Is that what you had in mind?

14 posted on 12/31/2005 8:37:35 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Something like that. Loaning them some B-52s in a similar manner loaded with nukes would also suffice.


15 posted on 12/31/2005 8:40:32 AM PST by 308MBR (Not only older, but bolder. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME


bump


16 posted on 12/31/2005 8:52:47 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

You have no chance to survive...make your time!


17 posted on 12/31/2005 9:06:15 AM PST by Nik Naym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
..No nukes,,

Don't be too sure. In January of 2003, Japan issued a statement that they seemed to be missing a few hundred kilograms of Plutonium (weapons-grade) by-product from their waste disposal program, enough for about 25 bombs. Then a week or two later said the discrepancy was just due to "book-keeping" errors. Right.

In my estimation, if they don't have the assembled weapons, they have the parts ready to put together. And those devices will have been engineered to fit their delivery systems.

18 posted on 12/31/2005 9:17:48 AM PST by MrNatural ("...You want the truth!?...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrNatural

If Japan does have a secret nuclear program, the New York Times Tokyo office is probably busily working to expose it.


19 posted on 12/31/2005 9:24:57 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
faced with domestic discontent stemming from such factors as economic disparities within the country — intrudes into Japanese territorial waters

China is experiencing astonishing economic growth. That sort of growth, historically, often leads to very serious internal disturbances. China does a good job of controlling our knowledge of what is really going on, particularly in rural and isolated areas.

I wouldn't be surprised at all to see the Chinese try to quell internal dissent through foreign policy adventurism. That is what Argentina attempted in 1982 and any Chinese effort would be much more dangerous.

Although the Japanese are safe for now they needs to seriously consider full rearmament.

20 posted on 12/31/2005 9:35:34 AM PST by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson