Sure "ID" is possible by humans. What's amazing is that the fact that humans weren't around 4 billion years ago just skipped right off your brain.
You really don't get it, do you?
Classic example of linguistic "bait & switch" (changing definitions in mid-stream).
ID, as promoted by the charlatans at the Discovery Institute, is supposed to be an "explanation" for things that they claim can't occur by natural means. What humans do in the lab, however, is done by natural means. Clearly, whatever we do in the lab is not the same "ID" as is being promoted by the Discovery Institute. One isn't the other, and isn't evidence of the other.
If someone can't handle relatively simple concepts like that, then he's not prepared for debates like this one.