If a person was to say "I suspect this will be about a credible as the South Korean cloning experiments." everytime they read any sciecne article from now on, what do you suspect their % accuracy rate would be?
I was making a specific reference to only this particular article. I made no generalized statements about other 'science articles'. on that basis, your comment makes absolutely no sense and implies that I am taking a position that cannot be supported by what I actually said.
Your statement is typical of so many evolutionists. You read so much into so little, yet claim your beliefs are supported by the facts when the evidence simply isn't there.
connectthedots, I believe, is the one who stated on another thread that evolution would require simultaneous identical mutations in a mating pair.