Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005

as someone who believes in creation/ID I have never been a big fan of the whole watch analogy. I, too, do not think it is very relevant. On the other hand, the evolutionist's comparison of evolution with the law of gravity is just as weak. they have virtually nothing to do with one another.

Both example are nothing more than illustrations which prove absolutely nothing.


111 posted on 12/31/2005 12:41:24 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots
On the other hand, the evolutionist's comparison of evolution with the law of gravity is just as weak. they have virtually nothing to do with one another.

We usually compare evolution to the THEORY of gravity, not the LAW of gravity, in order to explain why the THEORY of evolution is "only" a theory.

In case you missed it, a scientific theory explains the mechanisms of how something works. I.E. gravity is real, as is evolution. But the THEORY of gravity and evolution are different things. The theory of gravity, despite the fact that we can observe it everywhere is actually not well understood. I believe one of the current theories of gravity relates to warping of space.

The theory of evolution is quite a bit more settled science, in that we understand "survival of the fittest", and DNA mutations, etc.

The bottom line is that evolution is both a fact (because it happens), and a scientific theory. Just like gravity.

113 posted on 12/31/2005 12:59:14 PM PST by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson