[RaceBannon]

Wrong, ID makes no claim whatsoever about a maker's origin being terrestrial or extra-terresstrial, that is where Creationists and ID promoters differ.

I attended a large ID conference at Yale a few years ago. ID allows for long time periods, allows for many things that Creation would argue against, so, it is NOT creationism repackaged like Limbaugh falsely asserts.

It is a pure scientific approach to the origin of life and the observations of life and chemical processes that make up life and our physical world, all done without the blinders of evolution to effect the outcome of results and teories supposed.

It is totally intellectual honesty, unlike the false religion of evolution.

[ThomasNast]

I'm still convinced that Mozart wrote that symphony. I realize that this is based more on a belief system as opposed to scientific study, but that really is my belief. I certainly can't PROVE he wrote it, either.

I bet that someone can show the mathematical odds that squids randomly squirting ink on paper could have produced the exact same score, and they might convince others that symphonies get produced through natural means -- but it'll take a lot more to convince me.

[js1138]

It is totally intellectual honesty, unlike the false religion of evolution.

So you would agree with the top ID advocates that evolution actually occurred and that common descent can be accepted as a given.

[whattajoke]

I attended a large ID conference at Yale a few years ago. ID allows for long time periods,

Really? When was that? How did I miss it? How many years ago? Who spoke? Does the bible allow for "long time periods?"

[ID] is totally intellectual honesty, unlike the false religion of evolution.

This, in spite of the fact that ID's inventor, Behe, was caught in numerous lies on the stand recently? This, in spite of the Wedge document, which makes your argument moot? (I know you won't read that link, of course, but I openly challenge you to do so and explain it in the context of your post. Oh, and Happy New Year.)