[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I dont need to refute what you said because what I posted was accurate. It was the direct quotes from scientists work and papers."

Horse manure. For one thing, the Etheridge you quoted wrote his piece 120 years ago. He was a 19th century anti-darwinist, not a modern day scientist. He wasn't a *world renowned* scientist; he was a nobody. You lied about who he was (You got his name wrong too, it's not N Etheridge, his name was Robert Etheridge.) He wasn't a paleontologist, he was a Assistant Keeper of Geology at the Museum. And the Dr. Pierre P. Grasse you quoted was a Neo-Lamarkian EVOLUTIONIST, not a creationist in ANY WAY.

The least you could do, if you were really a Christian, would be to answer my points as I took the time to answer yours. Otherwise, you are the definition of a troll.

"It was from peer accepted books, and therefore MUST be considered accurate by evolutionists"

This is a joke, right? You DO realize, if this is true, that the majority of peer accepted books think that creationism is a fairy tale?

[RaceBannon]

Wow, the anti-Christian bias coming from your post makes yo sound irrational.

And I dont care what Etheridge wrote. The post stands.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

I know the list is long already, but how about,

"It was from peer accepted books, and therefore MUST be considered accurate by evolutionists"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1549524/posts?page=151#151

for Your Brain On Creationism?