[101st-Eagle]

In other words, you're just stating something as fact. Explain to me scientifically how there was no "before" before the big bang. You can't do it. All you will do is state it just is what it is. I believe that is weak.

[Dimensio]

In other words, you're just stating something as fact.

I'm explaining the implications of the Big Bang theory.

Explain to me scientifically how there was no "before" before the big bang.

How can there be a "before" when there is no time?

You can't do it.

Your inability to understand a relatively simple concept is not my failing.

All you will do is state it just is what it is.

I'm stating a direct implication of the Big Bang. You, however, have refused to explain why you even brough the totally irrelevant topic of the Big Bang into a discussion of the theory of evolution.