Posted on 12/30/2005 8:09:57 AM PST by YaYa123
BREAKING NEWS NBC, MSNBC and news services Updated: 10:50 a.m. ET Dec. 30, 2005 WASHINGTON - The U.S. Justice Department has launched an investigation to see who disclosed details about a secret domestic eavesdropping operation, department officials said Friday.
We are opening an investigation into the unauthorized disclosure of classified materials related to the NSA, one official said, referring to the National Security Agency
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Witch hunt!! Surely this is not as important as finding out who "outed" Plame. Vast right-wing conspiracy at it again. </sarcasm>
About flippin' time!
I'll ask again in this post.
What was leaked that was not well known?
Everyone knows the government spies. We just didn't know he was doing it without warrants. So is the leak that he didn't get warrants? That doesn't help the terrorist!
About 15 minutes ago, I heard this reported as "breaking news" on MSNBC, went to their website and found this article.
I just noticed Pete Williams contributed to the article.
DUH IT IS NY Times reporters
HELLO Dubya
I tell you one thing it going get good very soon
I predict a well known Senator from Massachusetts will be found as the culprit and will receive just a slap on the wrist!
;^)
It's not the "what" that was leaked so much as the "who".
Who in the service of this country leaked secret information to The New York Times and Wash Post?
No, knowing that the mere act of picking up a phone, any phone and calling somebody even in the US can trigger a tape recorder helps the terrorist.
I thought it was leaked by agents who resigned in fear of being prosecuted for illegally spying?
Didn't the FISA judge resign too?
Here's CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/30/nsa.leak/index.html
Inquiry opens into leak of domestic spying program
Friday, December 30, 2005; Posted: 10:56 a.m. EST (15:56 GMT)
MSM and RAT rumps will sting.
'What was leaked that was not well known? '
Just because it is "known", doesn't make it lawful to disclose. You'd be surprised what isn't "known" out there. But if you did, you would probably feel free to disclose it because it was so well "known". Self-adjudicating dolts with attitudes like yours is how this happens in the first place. That and uneven applications of the sanctions available.
Here's FOX News:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,180190,00.html
I suspect every criminal in the world who is planning to break the law has been paranoid to talk on the phone afraid that it may be tapped.
Seems it would hamper the terrorists ability to communicate if they were scared to phone or email.
How do you punish yourself like that..lol...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.