Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

<<<<
The article you posted, what is it about?
>>>>

It's about rising productivity.

Lets see if I get your point by going back to my illustration.

Company X has 1000 workers with an average wage of $20/hr.

Because of increase in productivity ( say, new software and computers, outsourcing, etc. ), they now need only 900 workers ( as an example ) to do the same work 1000 people once did.

Hence, they can increase the wages of 900 people because they laid off 100 people.

1000 people at $20/hr costs $20,000/hr
900 people at $22/hr costs only $19,800/hr
Savings of $200/hr due to productivity

In this sense, they do not really have to increase the price of goods/services because COSTS remain the same or less ( they do the same work with less people ).

Is this the point you are driving at ?

The question then becomes --- what happens to the 100 who are now out of work ?

No wonder there isn't much optimism among working people ( especially the older ones ) inspite the growth of productivity.


9 posted on 12/30/2005 8:37:58 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot
The question then becomes --- what happens to the 100 who are now out of work ?

What happened to the millions who used to farm in the US? They got better jobs and we produce more food, more cheaply than ever before.

10 posted on 12/30/2005 8:53:18 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
No wonder there isn't much optimism among working people ( especially the older ones ) inspite the growth of productivity.

Which is why we have Luddites. Productivity has probably put more people out of work than any other factor throughout history.

But there are different solutions to the equation. If a company's market is growing, it can freeze hiring, or slow down the pace of hiring.

If employees have to learn new technology to be more productive, or take on responsibility for higher output because of higher productivity, then they should receive higher wages. That doesn't mean they should get all of the extra revenue, but there should be a nice balance between higher wages and higher profits. A healthy market will allow that, but the market isn't healthy when the Federal Reserve body slams the entire economy when people start getting higher wages, even when those higher wages are due to higher productivity.

Of course, there are many managements out there that lack any creativity whatsoever, so they use the sledgehammer approach and they do layoffs first, which forces the remaining employees to be more productive. Most employees actually go on to better careers. They are forced to go to more successful companies, or to improve their education and become more productive that way. Some will go to work for startup companies in somebody's garage, such as Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, and many other now large companies used to be. That's why venture capital and entrepreneurship is so important in an economy that relies so much on productivity gains.

14 posted on 12/30/2005 9:25:06 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson