Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chimera

Somewhere, I read that conventional renewable energy sources(that is, NON superconducting, non nuclear), like wind, solar and geothermal power, could not be expected to handle more than about 5% of the average power needs, in the best-case scenario!!


84 posted on 12/31/2005 3:23:15 PM PST by Rca2000 (I am Omni-one. I see all, hear all and know all, I can read your mind. You cannot stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Rca2000
Sounds about right to me. In this country, the figure that sticks in my mind is 0.6% of electricity generation came from "renewable" sources, excluding hydropower since that is a "traditional" generation source. But since electricity production is about one-third of all energy production, it represents about 0.2% of total energy production. Kind of hard to run a modern country on totals like that.

But the real fly in the ointment when it comes to things like solar and windpower is availability. Relying on intermittent energy sources for a significant portion of baseload power requirements is a prescription for disaster when it comes to running an industrialized country that depends on high-tech for its living. Not having energy when you need it will leave a lot of people unhappy at best, at risk for their lives at worst.

88 posted on 01/01/2006 1:50:14 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson