Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks; All
Your remark about manganese process scrubbing led to Enviroscrub and the Pahlman process. Interestingly their "our technology" site area contained only this diagram:



No technical details whatever were given. No consumption rates, no description of the technology, no cost estimates, nothing. The 2,000 cubic feet per minute demonstration trailer has a toylike capacity but looks to be an overweight load. The process appears to consume a large volume of water although probably less than wet scrubbing. the reaction reagents are proprietary. Rather looks like a catalytic process with associated catalyst poisoning problems, etc. Makeup water strangely needs RO. Reagent is electrolytically regenerated. Looks like high energy consumption and maintenance costs.

Am I seeing this wrongly?

http://www.enviroscrub.com/index.asp
37 posted on 12/30/2005 9:58:39 AM PST by Iris7 (Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Iris7

I think they have a couple full size scrub units on line at Minnesota Power. Can't say why they haven't updated their web page. They claim the manganese is recycled and there is no need for a big sludge pond. Power consumption is much less than a typical scrubber, which I'm told can consume 25-30 percent of the power plant's production.


38 posted on 12/30/2005 10:04:44 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson