To: lugsoul
If you don't want Hillary, or someone like her, to have unfettered surveillance capability, then you shouldn't be complacent about this President having it. As one Freeper pointed out to me yesterday, we'll just change the laws once a Democrat is in office. Yeah, right.
19 posted on
12/29/2005 9:13:37 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
If you don't want Hillary, or someone like her, to have unfettered surveillance capability, then you shouldn't be complacent about this President having it. As one Freeper pointed out to me yesterday, we'll just change the laws once a Democrat is in office. Yeah, right.
As if Democrats follow the law anyway...
56 posted on
12/29/2005 9:55:57 AM PST by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: Wolfie
RATs are no longer restrained by what's legal. That's like wanting to be nice to terrorists so hostages will be well treated.
105 posted on
12/29/2005 11:54:40 AM PST by
gogeo
(Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson