Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antonello
Are you saying that if you had the Ark in your country and another country was demanding the patch of land it was in, you wouldn't consider going to war to retain it?

I'd invite them all in to see it and touch it.

99 posted on 12/29/2005 7:11:36 PM PST by Thumper1960 ("There is no 'tolerance', there are only changing fashions in intolerance." - 'The Western Standard')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Thumper1960; Antonello

I think they should find some oxen who have never been yoked, separate them from their newborn calves, put the ark on a wagon and see if the oxen take the ark back to Jerusalem. Would be interesting, wouldn't it?


101 posted on 12/29/2005 7:19:41 PM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: Thumper1960

No man unpurified could touch it without dying. Whether or not that would still happen is open to question, since the temple veil was rent upon Jesus' death and of the prophecy in Joel that in the latter days "I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh". Christians sufficiently prayed up might could get away with it , but given the history of it and the OT injunctions its better left having it handled the way the Law says it should be handled. It is the symbolic presence of God in the midst of men and his Glory did rest between the two cherubim....you wouldn't just handle it like an old couch!


102 posted on 12/29/2005 7:27:54 PM PST by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson