To: oceanview
"even Ginsburg says the reasoning in Roe is non-existent. just words on a page, the arbitrary opinion of the men deciding it at the time."
Quote please.
42 posted on
12/28/2005 10:31:52 PM PST by
ndt
To: ndt
the thread is probably here somewhere, that story made the news some months ago. not that Ginsburg wouldn't find some new "emanations and penumbras" to legalize unlimited abortion if the case came up before her again, but she commented that the ruling was a little weak the first time around.
To: ndt
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a supporter of abortion, has acknowledged the difficulty of justifying the judicial activism of Roe: 'Roe, I believe, would have been more acceptable as a judicial decision if it had not gone beyond a ruling on the extreme statute before the Court.'
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson