Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garbanzo

those combatants can receive due process - through military tribunal - no one is arguing that Padilla should be held forever without due process.

the courts on the other hand - are even looking to extend these rights to NON-CITIZENS. Should Khallid Sheik Mohammed have any rights in the US civilian court system?


123 posted on 01/01/2006 5:48:39 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
those combatants can receive due process - through military tribunal - no one is arguing that Padilla should be held forever without due process.

A legitimate issue for the Supreme Court is whether or not a military tribunal for a civilian constitutes due process. The Court has not ruled on this particular set of facts (US citizen captured in the US) but the Bush Administration doesn't appear to want to take the chance the Court might see things differently.

126 posted on 01/01/2006 7:44:23 PM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson