See my response to VA. In short, I've indicated I understand full well your position. If it makes you feel good, you can keep repeating it. But don't pretend to me that evolutionists are completely agnostic with respect to the science of the origin of life. If someone claimed to have shown that naturalistic/gradualistic abiogenesis violates the SLoT, just as a random hypothetical, you guys will just shrug your shoulders and carry on??? Right.
But of course, we know life exists, we know it emerged via some sort of natuaralistic/gradualistic process, and we know SLoT always holds, so we KNOW this can't be possible, right?